An analysis of the drug-focused licensing deals (out-licensing and in-licensing) made by Big Pharma companies shows an uptick in partnering from 2014 to 2015, followed by a slight decrease in 2016 that has held steady through 2018. Despite that slight decline, the peer set increased deal volume by roughly 15% between the beginning and the end of the five-year period. Total deal values rose even more, roughly 25%.
Immuno-oncology continues to draw pharma companies to the deal table.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) 79th Scientific Sessions was held in San Francisco, CA from 7–11 June 2019.
Faced with pressure from stakeholders – particularly patients – governments, regulators, and some countries have introduced new options and/or processes to speed up access to medicines. This includes access before marketing authorization, and speeding up the marketing authorization, or less often, the health technology assessment processes.
Acquisitions and licensing are core to pharma and big biotech growth as pipelines thin and assets lose patent protection. Yet a look back at prior years’ eye-popping deal sums reveals many billions of dollars of write-offs and lost value. Key assets failed or disappointed in at least half of 2014’s largest acquisitions and licensing deals. Failure is part of the drug discovery landscape, but some lessons can be learned from dud deals.
The 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was held in Chicago, IL from May 31st through June 4th, 2019. This year’s conference was highly varied, with key data presented for drugs in numerous different classes and indications.
The 71st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from May 4-10, 2019.
As a supplement to our well-known quarterly Outlook report, Biomedtracker is pleased to present a longer-term look at some key late-stage drugs projected to hit the market in 2020.
The challenges faced by biosimilar developers are not unlike those confronting their branded counterparts. First, companies must develop high-quality biosimilars and obtain regulatory approval. Next, they must then navigate the vast array of commercial nuances that exist at the national level in order for their products to be used in the clinical setting.
This analysis includes insights from eight interviewed experts from pharma, medical device, or digital health companies.
Datamonitor Healthcare attended the ISPOR 21st Annual European Congress held in Barcelona on 10–14 November. Here, we present some of the hot topics discussed at the event.
Competition from drugs in the same class (with the same mechanism of action and treating the same disease) presents a clear challenge to a first-in-class market entrant. And the speed with which these competitors arrive impacts market dynamics, commercial strategies, and, increasingly, drug prices. Therapies that enjoy extended monopolies as sole entrants in a particular class have greater commercial flexibility in negotiating with payers. Multiple drugs in the same class give payers better leverage with which to negotiate rebates and discounts with drug companies.
Commercialization of modern-day gene therapies is now a reality. Next-generation modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR- T) therapies are fully in launch mode in the US, with final approvals having also occurred in the EU.
Gene therapy has undergone transformative enhancements over the last 20 years, with improvements to technologies and advancements in the pipeline that aim to invigorate the field in its second generation
Payers are not overly worried about the cost of bladder cancer, due to the relatively small patient population in comparison to other solid tumors.
Sign up to the Pharma Intelligence Report Store Newsletter to get the latest blogs, news, reports and discounts!