Data plays a key role in healthcare systems’ shifts towards value-focused outcomes. Such data includes outcomes and cost data, adherence data, and increasingly, patient-reported data, behavioral and social media data.
Biosimilars are expected to drive significant cost savings for healthcare systems, yet there are many considerations that will affect the success of biosimilars, ranging from clinical development, regulatory approval, and ongoing legal disputes around patents. In the US, this is still a seminal period, and for that reason the potential effects of biosimilars in terms of levels of competition are still too early to gauge. Still, European experience with biosimilars may give an indication as to how market dynamics will play out and the degree to which biosimilar sponsors may discount their biosimilars in the US.
We set out to examine the extent to which order of market entry influences the prospects of achieving a satisfactory return on investment for companies developing branded generic and generic inhaled products.
Patient centricity is the buzzword of this decade, and necessarily so: it either underpins, or is an inevitable result of, all the forces shaping today’s rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.
Over the nine-year period from 2006 to 2014, the Big Pharma, Mid Pharma, and Japan Pharma peer sets collectively spent an annual average of $94bn on R&D of pharmaceuticals, with spending growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6%.
Pharmaceutical companies constantly re-assess their pipelines and portfolios to determine the best strategies for their business.
Precision medicine is typically associated with the use of therapies that target particular disease-linked genetic mutations, identified via a diagnostic test.
Datamonitor Healthcare has carried out a comprehensive analysis of gene therapy products in commercial development worldwide based on information derived from Pharmaprojects.
Immuno-oncology is an emerging field in medicine that has the potential to radically change how cancer is treated. The Big Pharma and Mid Pharma peer sets are an integral part of development and have been furthering efforts via deal-making.
Between 2011 and 2015, Big Pharma – a peer set of approximately 16 firms across the world with large R&D and sales organizations, and sales valued at $10bn or more – signed over 1,100 drug-focused deals, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 10%.
Total sales from the mid pharma peer set amounted to $69.4bn in 2011; by the end of 2012, this figure rose by 1.6% to $71.0bn. During 2012 the peer set constituents exhibited varying degrees of sales growth.
Key Highlights BIIB-037 Amyloid beta PET data show positive Abeta reduction; cognitive results are not interpretable with such small numbers. (BIIB) BIIB-037 Phase Ib result interpretation may be effected by the ApoE4 dropouts in the treatment arm. (BIIB) MK-8931 and BIIB-037 show sufficient target engagement, but there is no evidence to date that amyloid clearance […]
Sign up to the Pharma Intelligence Report Store Newsletter to get the latest blogs, news, reports and discounts!