Report Store | Pharma intelligence
  • My Account
    • 0Shopping Cart
  • $0.00
  • Disease analysis
    • Anemias
    • Bacterial infections
    • Bleeding disorders
    • Brain Cancer
    • Breast and gynecological cancer
    • Cardiovascular and Metabolic
    • Central Nervous System
    • Cerebrovascular diseases
    • Dermatology
    • Diabetes and diabetic complications
    • Gastroenterology
    • Gastrointestinal cancer
    • Head and Neck Cancer
    • Hypertension
    • Immunology and Inflammation
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Ischemic heart disease
    • Leukemia
    • Lung Cancer
    • Lymphoma
    • Oncology overview
    • Market Spotlight
    • Mens Health
    • Neurology
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Other Hematological Cancers
    • Other metabolic diseases
    • Other Solid Cancers
    • Pain
    • Psychiatry
    • Respiratory
    • Rheumatology
    • Skin cancer
    • Thrombosis
    • Urological cancer
    • Vaccines
    • Viral infections
    • Women’s Health
  • Strategy analysis
    • Bleeding disorders
    • Breast and gynecological cancer
    • Cardiovascular and Metabolic
    • Central Nervous System
    • Commercial Strategy
    • Dealmaking and R&D
    • Head and Neck Cancer
    • Hot Topics
    • Infectious Diseases
    • KOL Insight
    • Leukemia
    • Lung Cancer
    • Manufacturing
    • Market Access
    • Neurology
    • Oncology
    • Outsourcing
    • Pricing & Reimbursement
    • R&D
    • Regulatory & Therapeutic Area
    • Trends
    • Urological cancer
  • Company analysis
    • Big Pharma
    • Emerging Pharma
    • Hot Topics
    • Japan Pharma
    • M&A Analysis
    • Mid Pharma
  • Drug analysis
    • A
    • B-C
    • D-F
    • G-L
    • M-O
    • P-R
    • S-T
    • U-Z
  • MedTech analysis
    • Allergy
    • Autoimmune / Immunology
    • Cardiovascular
    • Dermatology
    • Endocrine
    • ENT / Dental
    • Gastroenterology
    • Hearing
    • Hematology
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Metabolic
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics / Gynecology
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Orthopedics
    • Osteoporosis
    • Psychiatry
    • Renal
    • Respiratory
    • Rheumatology
    • Urology
  • Opinion & analysis
    • Business Development
    • Business Management
    • Clinical Trials
    • Digital Health
    • Cybersecurity
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Digital patient management
    • Digital policy & regulation
    • Finance & Pricing
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • ICT and Health
    • Leadership
    • Legislation Regulation & Policy
    • Market Access
    • Market Intelligence
    • Medical
    • Pharmaceutical Device
    • Pharmaceutical Research
    • Strategy & Innovation
    • Tech companies & Data
    • Tech & Pharma
  • Blogs
  • Search
  • Menu
You are here: Home > Blogs > Disease > Rare and Innovative? Not Enough for European Payers

Rare and Innovative? Not Enough for European Payers

December 18, 2018 | Disease

Melanie senior

There are no longer any free tickets to access European or US drug reimbursement, even for highly novel drugs that address rare diseases. UK cost watchdog the National Institute of Health & Care Excellence (NICE) and the US Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) have both turned down two newly-approved, innovative orphan drugs as too expensive.

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals’ Onpattro (patisiran) and Ionis/Akcea’s Tegsedi (inotersen) treat a very rare disease called hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTR), for which no other therapies exist. Both reduce disability and enhance quality of life. But Tegsedi costs $388,000 per patient per year in the UK, and Onpattro costs $167,000 – and there’s little evidence as yet that their benefits endure over the longer-term. So NICE declared in late 2018 that neither drug would be an effective use of resources. ICER, faced with $450,000 annual list prices for both treatments, reached a similar conclusion.

 

NICE’s rejection is preliminary – a review will happen in February 2019 — and ICER’s opinions are non-binding on the US’ multiple payers. But the UK reimbursement process in particular is a familiar dance: manufacturers go in with aggressively priced, highly novel medicines – Onpattro is the first RNA interference (RNAi)-based drug ever approved in the US and Europe –  and NICE says ‘no way’, even with the more generous cost-effectiveness thresholds that accompany highly specialised technologies. Manufacturers come back with a revised price (typically) or some other kind of patient access agreement (less often), and the drug may then get a green light. The approval may apply only to a certain patient groups – though with only about 150 ATTR sufferers in the UK, restrictions may be less likely in this case.

 

The steps are so familiar that Ionis’ spokesperson admitted that NICE’s decision was “not unexpected”. NICE’s objections tend to cover similar ground, too – besides price, manufacturers are regularly chastised for assumptions made in their economic models and costings, usually biasing in favour of treatment, and insufficient evidence of long-term benefits (a fact of life for new medicines).

 

One might wonder why sponsors do not check in ahead with NICE – which offers sponsors early advice – and use more conservative estimates. The companies had already offered NICE confidential discounts. But the estimated incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life year (QALY) for Tegsedi was still nearly three times the threshold (per the manufacturers’ own economic model) and over six times using NICE’s preferred model. ICER, similarly, is recommending discounts of between 90-97% for the drugs.

 

These are not slight adjustments. Nearly 20 years after NICE came into being, the discrepancies between manufacturers’ and payers’ estimates of value can still be vast – even, as in this case, when there is more than one option (Pfizer has a similar drug on the way in a related disease). Alnylam anticipated payers’ value-quest in the US, engaging in discussions around value-based agreements for Onpattro with payers including Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Express Scripts, Aetna. That is good. Prices that are closer to payers’ well-publicised thresholds would be even better – not least for patients, who could access treatments faster.

Related Content

Market Access Trends in Europe

FacebookTweetPin

Related posts:

Coronavirus: A catalyst for digital health?
Disease

Coronavirus: A catalyst for digital health?

  • March, 20 2020
  • 1606

Every cloud has a silver lining. Coronavirus will be the same. One of its silver linings may be faster uptake of digital health tools and gadgets, as individuals are compelled to remain at home amid one of the century’s most concerning pandemics.   

More Options for Ovarian cancer
Disease

More Options for Ovarian cancer

  • March, 17 2020
  • 1068

One in 78 women will suffer from ovarian cancer during their lifetime. The condition accounts for more deaths than any other cancer of the reproductive system – and ranks fifth in overall cancer deaths among women.  The good news is that the range

The Big 2020 Challenge
Disease

The Big 2020 Challenge

  • January, 16 2020
  • 2188

Over the last three decades, the biotechnology industry has transformed our medicines cabinet, bringing new, effective treatments for a range of unmet needs, from rare genetic conditions, to stubborn cancers and debilitating chronic diseases. Yet several

Related Content
Read more
  • Home
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Refund policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Discounts
  • Market Spotlight – Reports
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • Sitemap
Copyright © 2022 Pharma Intelligence UK Limited Pharma Intelligence UK Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG. Pharma Intelligence UK Limited is part of the Pharma Intelligence Group.
GSK buys Tesaro to re-enter oncology race As Keytruda expands, payers recoil

Sign up to the Pharma Intelligence Report Store Newsletter to get the latest blogs, news, reports and discounts!

Pharma Intelligence
This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.
Call Back
Scroll to top